﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instinct Avatars Wolf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slarf.org/instinct-avatars-wolf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slarf.org/instinct-avatars-wolf/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=instinct-avatars-wolf</link>
	<description>Second Life Avatar Review Files</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broken</title>
		<link>http://www.slarf.org/instinct-avatars-wolf/comment-page-1/#comment-3983</link>
		<dc:creator>Broken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slarf.org/?p=330#comment-3983</guid>
		<description>Having used one of these avatars since before they were publically released I must admit that I have not yet found another wolf that can compare.
Yes, there are some glaring shortcomings such as it&#039;s insane height (over 7&#039; by SL scale) and the method for the tail function on the flexi design, but just for sheer looks it still stands far and away above all subsequent offerings.

Perhaps when the next engine, currently in beta test phase, is released they&#039;ll be able to do better by many things, but I&#039;ll keep my good old Instinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having used one of these avatars since before they were publically released I must admit that I have not yet found another wolf that can compare.<br />
Yes, there are some glaring shortcomings such as it&#8217;s insane height (over 7&#8242; by SL scale) and the method for the tail function on the flexi design, but just for sheer looks it still stands far and away above all subsequent offerings.</p>
<p>Perhaps when the next engine, currently in beta test phase, is released they&#8217;ll be able to do better by many things, but I&#8217;ll keep my good old Instinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolInvictus</title>
		<link>http://www.slarf.org/instinct-avatars-wolf/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>SolInvictus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slarf.org/?p=330#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>This av just..doesn&#039;t do it for me. I can see where they were going with the realistic texture and all, but every time people do this, it comes out grainy just like PsiCorp&#039;s avatars. The eyes look too big for the head, the legs are placed funny, and the hands are really big. Just the ONE thing that irritated me the most was the grainy textures...people need to get better at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This av just..doesn&#8217;t do it for me. I can see where they were going with the realistic texture and all, but every time people do this, it comes out grainy just like PsiCorp&#8217;s avatars. The eyes look too big for the head, the legs are placed funny, and the hands are really big. Just the ONE thing that irritated me the most was the grainy textures&#8230;people need to get better at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W</title>
		<link>http://www.slarf.org/instinct-avatars-wolf/comment-page-1/#comment-2749</link>
		<dc:creator>W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slarf.org/?p=330#comment-2749</guid>
		<description>&quot;Eye States (Wolfess only)&quot;
What? Why on earth would only females have expressions?
Anyway, I don&#039;t really like the look of this a whole lot, the digi legs look positioned wrong, they just too far back and don&#039;t look natural. And something about the head just doesn&#039;t look quite right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Eye States (Wolfess only)&#8221;<br />
What? Why on earth would only females have expressions?<br />
Anyway, I don&#8217;t really like the look of this a whole lot, the digi legs look positioned wrong, they just too far back and don&#8217;t look natural. And something about the head just doesn&#8217;t look quite right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.slarf.org/instinct-avatars-wolf/comment-page-1/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slarf.org/?p=330#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>i need the link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need the link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 361/362 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.slarf.org @ 2012-02-08 03:22:41 -->
